Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Hoka Bondi 7: Which Running Shoe is Right for You?
As a runner, having the right pair of shoes is crucial to prevent injuries and achieve maximum performance. Brooks and Hoka are two popular brands that offer excellent options for runners with different needs. In this article, I’ll be comparing two of their top models, the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7, to help you decide which one is right for you.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 is a neutral shoe that offers comfort, support, and style. It features DNA Loft cushioning, a plush and responsive feel, and a 3D Fit Print upper that adapts to your foot for a customized fit. The Glycerin 19 is also 20% lighter than its predecessor, making it a great option for runners who want a lightweight shoe without compromising cushioning.
On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 is a maximalist shoe that’s designed for runners who want extra cushioning and high-level support. It features an EVA midsole that’s softer and lighter than traditional foam, providing excellent shock absorption and a smooth ride. The Bondi 7 also has a redesigned upper that offers a more adaptive fit and breathability, making it a great choice for long-distance running.
Comparing the Design Features of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When it comes to finding the perfect pair of running shoes, the design features are just as important as the fit and comfort. A good design can provide the necessary support and enhance overall performance. In this section, we’ll compare the design features of the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 to help you choose the right shoe for your needs.
The sole design of running shoes is critical to the overall performance and comfort. The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a fully articulated outsole with flexible grooves that provide a smooth transition from heel to toe. Additionally, the Brooks Glycerin 19 has a “DNA LOFT” cushioning feature that enhances the soft feeling of the shoe without compromising responsiveness.
On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 features a “Meta-Rocker” geometry, which is designed to enhance the natural running gait. This technology helps to reduce the impacts on the joints by creating a smoother transition from heel to toe. Furthermore, the Hoka Bondi 7 has a “Compression Molded EVA” midsole that increases shock absorption and protects the foot from impact.
The upper design is responsible for providing support and comfort to the foot. The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a two-layer mesh upper that provides excellent breathability and a comfortable fit. The upper also has 3D printed overlays that provide additional support and boost durability.
On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 has a breathable, lightweight mesh upper that ensures proper ventilation and temperature regulation during runs. The upper also has an internal heel counter that provides additional support and stabilizes the foot.
The weight of a shoe can significantly impact performance, especially during long-distance runs. The Brooks Glycerin 19 weighs around 10.2 ounces, making it a lightweight and comfortable shoe for running. On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 is slightly heavier, weighing around 10.9 ounces. However, the added weight contributes to the shoe’s durability and support.
Durability is critical when it comes to running shoes, as they are subjected to wear and tear during regular use. The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a blown rubber outsole that enhances durability and grip. Additionally, the 3D printed overlays provide extra protection to high-wear areas of the shoe.
Similarly, the Hoka Bondi 7 has a high-abrasion outsole that provides excellent durability and traction on various surfaces. The upper design’s strategic reinforcements also contribute to the shoe’s overall durability and make it ideal for regular use.
In summary, both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 have unique design features that make them stand out from the rest. The Brooks Glycerin 19 provides excellent cushioning and breathability, while the Hoka Bondi 7 offers superior shock absorption and enhances the natural running gait. Ultimately, choosing the best shoe for your needs will depend on your personal preference, running style, and performance requirements.
Cushioning Systems and Comfort of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When it comes to running shoes, cushioning plays a significant role in providing comfort and support to the feet, especially during long runs. In this section, we’ll compare the cushioning systems and comfort of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 features Brooks’ signature DNA Loft technology, which is a blend of EVA foam, rubber, and air. This cushioning system offers a soft, plush feeling underfoot while still maintaining durability and responsiveness. Additionally, the new OrthoLite sock liner provides an extra layer of cushioning and support, enhancing the overall comfort of the shoes.
On the other hand, Hoka Bondi features a full-length EVA midsole, providing a maximal cushioning experience to the runners. This midsole is soft yet responsive, ensuring a comfortable ride for those longing for maximum cushioning. However, it lacks the durability found in the DNA Loft technology and may compress over time.
Both Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7 offer exceptional comfort to runners. The Brooks Glycerin 19 is designed with a plush interior that accommodates various foot shapes, while the Hoka Bondi 7 features a wider toe box that enhances the comfort of the feet.
One notable difference in the comfort of the two shoes is the weight. The Hoka Bondi 7 is heavier than the Brooks Glycerin 19, which may affect its comfort level for some runners. The Brooks Glycerin 19 is lighter, making it an ideal choice for those desiring a lightweight and comfortable shoe.
|Brooks Glycerin 19||Hoka Bondi 7|
|DNA Loft technology approach with a combination of foam, rubber, and air||Full-length EVA midsole|
|OrthoLite sock liner adds an extra layer of cushioning and support||Wider toe box|
|Exceptional durability and responsiveness||Soft yet responsive midsole|
|Plush and accommodating interior||Heavier than Glycerin 19|
In conclusion, both shoes offer ample cushioning and exceptional comfort to runners. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what the runner needs in a shoe. The Brooks Glycerin 19 may be a better choice if durability and responsiveness are essential, while the Hoka Bondi 7 could be a better option for maximum cushioning.
Upper Materials and Fit of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
The upper materials of both Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7 differ significantly, affecting their overall fit and feel. The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a 3D Fit Print upper that provides a secure fit without any pressure points. This technology creates a custom fit that stretches and adapts to your foot’s shape as you move. It is engineered to offer optimal breathability and flexibility for long-distance runs.
On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 comes with an engineered mesh upper that delivers a streamlined fit with strategic support and breathability. The mesh material is lightweight and breathable, which helps to keep your feet cool and dry. It has a smooth, seamless design that reduces the risk of irritation or blistering, even during high-intensity workouts.
When it comes to fit, the Brooks Glycerin 19 has a slightly narrow option for those with a more slender foot. Meanwhile, the Hoka Bondi 7 has a wider range of options that cater to different foot shapes and sizes. It provides a roomier fit in the forefoot, making it an excellent choice for those with wide feet or those who require extra cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a padded tongue and collar for added comfort and support, while the Hoka Bondi 7 has a plush memory foam collar that conforms to the shape of your ankle for a customized fit. Both shoes come with traditional lace-up closures that offer a secure and adjustable fit, allowing you to find the perfect fit for your foot.
In summary, while the Brooks Glycerin 19 has a fixed, custom fit with the 3D Fit Print technology, the Hoka Bondi 7 offers a wider range of options to cater to different foot shapes and sizes. Both shoes come with features that promote comfort and support, such as padded tongues and collars, making them great options for long-distance runners.
|Brooks Glycerin 19||Hoka Bondi 7|
|3D Fit Print upper||Engineered mesh upper|
|Secure fit||Streamlined fit|
|Narrower fit option||A range of options to cater to different foot shapes and sizes|
|Padded tongue and collar||Plush memory foam collar|
|Traditional lace-up closure||Traditional lace-up closure|
Comparing the Traction and Durability of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When it comes to running shoes, traction and durability are essential factors to consider. In this section, I’ll be comparing the traction and durability of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7.
One of the critical things to consider when choosing a running shoe is the traction. Good traction ensures that you don’t slip or slide when running, especially on wet or slippery surfaces.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a blown rubber outsole that provides excellent traction on various surfaces. This outsole material is soft, which helps to increase the shoe’s grip on the road. The Hoka Bondi 7, on the other hand, features a durable rubber outsole that offers reliable traction on most surfaces.
Both shoes feature a well-designed tread pattern on the outsole that helps to provide better grip and flexibility when running. The Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7 are suitable for road running, and their traction is dependable on both wet and dry conditions.
Durability is another crucial factor to consider when purchasing a running shoe. Running shoes are subject to wear and tear, especially when used regularly.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a durable and breathable mesh upper that can withstand regular running activities. Additionally, the shoe has well-constructed overlays that increase the shoe’s durability and stability. The Hoka Bondi 7, on the other hand, has a more robust upper, which contributes significantly to its durability. The shoe features durable leather overlays that provide added stability and support to the foot.
When it comes to the midsole, both shoes are designed to offer unmatched durability. The Brooks Glycerin 19 features a DNA Loft foam midsole that offers superior cushioning and durability, while the Hoka Bondi 7 has a compression-molded EVA midsole that offers excellent arch support and durability.
In conclusion, when it comes to traction and durability, both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7 excel in their unique ways. However, while the Brooks Glycerin 19 offers softer traction, the Hoka Bondi 7 provides superior durability features. Ultimately, the better option comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of each runner.
|Brooks Glycerin 19||Hoka Bondi 7|
|Traction||Blown rubber outsole that provides excellent grip on most surfaces||Durable rubber outsole that offers reliable traction on various surfaces|
|Durability||Breathable mesh upper and durable overlays||Robust upper made of leather overlays and compression-molded EVA midsole|
Stability and Support of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When comparing the stability and support of running shoes, it’s essential to consider factors like the design of the sole, the amount of cushioning, and the overall fit of the shoe. The Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 are two highly rated shoes that offer excellent stability and support.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 is designed with a DNA LOFT Crash Pad that provides additional cushioning that adapts to the runner’s stride. This crash pad extends from the heel to the midfoot, which helps with shock absorption and protects the foot during impact. Furthermore, the Glycerin 19 has a sturdy external heel counter that helps to keep the foot in place, preventing unnecessary movement and reducing the risk of injury.
In contrast, the Hoka Bondi 7 features a uniquely shaped sole, which provides excellent stability while also offering the perfect balance of cushioning and support. The shoe’s full-length EVA midsole combines with the Meta-Rocker technology in the sole design to provide a smooth ride that encourages natural foot movement. Additionally, the shoe’s upper is made of a breathable mesh that provides a comfortable and supportive fit, reducing the risk of chafing and irritation.
When analyzing the stability and support of the Glycerin 19 and the Bondi 7, it’s essential to highlight the following factors:
- The Brooks Glycerin 19 offers a sturdy external heel counter that keeps the foot in place, preventing unnecessary movement and reducing the risk of injury.
- The Hoka Bondi 7 features a unique sole design that provides excellent stability while also offering the perfect balance of cushioning and support.
- Both shoes offer a comfortable and supportive fit, reducing the risk of chafing and irritation during long runs.
In conclusion, when choosing between the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7, runners should consider their individual needs and preferences. Both shoes offer excellent stability and support, but the Glycerin 19 is ideal for those who need extra cushioning and protection during high-impact runs, while the Bondi 7’s unique sole design makes it perfect for those who need additional stability and support.
Weight and Breathability of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When it comes to running shoes, the weight and breathability of the shoe play a crucial role in determining the level of comfort for the runner. In this section, we will compare the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 based on their weight and breathability.
The weight of a running shoe can significantly affect the running performance of an individual. The Brooks Glycerin 19 weighs around 9.1 ounces for the men’s shoe and 8.4 ounces for the women’s shoe. On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 is a relatively heavier shoe, with the men’s shoe weighing around 10.2 ounces and the women’s shoe weighing 8.9 ounces.
While the weight of the shoes may not make a significant difference during short distance running, it can quickly add up during longer runs. Thus, if you prefer a lighter running shoe for better speed and agility, the Brooks Glycerin 19 may be a better choice for you.
Breathability is the ability of the shoe to allow proper air circulation while running. A breathable shoe can prevent the accumulation of sweat and bacteria, which can cause discomfort and bad odor. Both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 shoes have excellent breathability features.
The Brooks Glycerin 19 has a double-jacquard mesh upper that facilitates ample airflow, keeping the feet dry and comfortable. The 3D print overlays provide excellent structure and support without compromising on the breathability aspect. On the other hand, the Hoka Bondi 7 has an open-engineered mesh that allows for enhanced breathability, and the Lycra comfort frame heel and plush collar provide a snug fit and maximum breathability.
Overall, both shoes prioritize breathability, but the Hoka Bondi 7 edges slightly over the Brooks Glycerin 19 in this aspect.
|Shoe Model||Weight (Men’s)||Weight (Women’s)|
|Brooks Glycerin 19||9.1 ounces||8.4 ounces|
|Hoka Bondi 7||10.2 ounces||8.9 ounces|
In summary, the Brooks Glycerin 19 is a lightweight shoe that offers excellent comfort and cushioning. The Hoka Bondi 7, on the other hand, has a slightly heavier build, but its superior breathability and cushioning make it a popular choice among long-distance runners.
Comparing the Price and Value of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
When it comes to purchasing a new pair of running shoes, the cost is always an important factor to consider. In the case of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7, there’s a noticeable difference in their prices. Brooks Glycerin 19 ranges from $149.95 to $169.95, while Hoka Bondi 7 is priced between $149.95 to $179.95.
Despite their varying costs, both running shoes offer great features that ensure value for money. Let’s take a closer look at what each shoe offers at their respective price points.
Brooks Glycerin 19
For its price point, Brooks Glycerin 19 offers a range of features that make it a top choice for neutral runners. Its soft cushioning and DNA LOFT technology provide enhanced comfort and support for long-distance runs. The shoe also comes with a breathable mesh upper that promotes air circulation and keeps your feet cool during your workouts.
What’s more, Brooks Glycerin 19 has a durable outsole that offers excellent traction on different running surfaces. Overall, this running shoe provides adequate features for its price and is ideal for runners looking for a comfortable and responsive shoe.
Hoka Bondi 7
On the other hand, Hoka Bondi 7 is designed for runners who prefer maximum cushioning and support. Its EVA material and Meta-Rocker technology ensure exceptional shock absorption, making it an excellent choice for high-impact activities.
For its price, Hoka Bondi 7 also comes with a durable outsole that provides superior traction on the road or the trail. Its breathable upper mesh enhances foot ventilation, ensuring a comfortable running experience.
Overall, Hoka Bondi 7 offers top-notch features for its price, providing runners with a durable and well-cushioned shoe that’s perfect for long-distance runs.
Price and Value Comparison
When comparing Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7, it’s evident that both shoes offer excellent value for their respective prices. While Brooks Glycerin 19 is slightly cheaper, Hoka Bondi 7’s superior cushioning and support make it worth the extra cost.
|Shoe Model||Price Range||Key Features|
|Brooks Glycerin 19||$149.90 to $169.95||DNA LOFT technology, soft cushioning, durable outsole, breathable mesh upper|
|Hoka Bondi 7||$149.95 to $179.95||EVA material, Meta-Rocker technology, durable outsole, breathable upper|
In conclusion, when it comes to the price and value of Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Hoka Bondi 7, both shoes offer great features that provide value for money. Depending on your preferences, you may choose the cost-effective option that offers the most comfortable fit, or the shoe that has superior cushioning and support at a slightly higher cost.
Real User Feedback and Reviews of Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7
I scoured the internet to compile real user feedback and reviews for the Brooks Glycerin 19 and Hoka Bondi 7. Here’s a summary of the most common comments:
Brooks Glycerin 19 Feedback
- Many users praised the Glycerin 19 for its cushioning, saying it provided a comfortable ride even on long runs.
- A few users noted that the shoe felt heavier than previous versions of the Glycerin.
- Some users reported durability issues, saying the outsole wore down quickly in high-wear areas.
- The shoe received mixed reviews regarding fit, with some users saying it ran true to size while others found it to be too narrow.
Hoka Bondi 7 Feedback
- Users raved about the Hoka Bondi 7’s cushioning, saying it was like running on clouds.
- Many users noted that the shoe felt lighter than expected, despite its size.
- Some users mentioned that the Bondi 7’s upper was less breathable than previous versions.
- A few users reported that the shoe wore out quickly and had durability issues.
When comparing the two shoes, it seems that both have their strengths and weaknesses. The Brooks Glycerin 19 appears to be a good option for those looking for a comfortable ride but may not be as durable as some would like. The Hoka Bondi 7, on the other hand, is praised for its cushioning and light weight, but may not be as breathable as previous versions and has some durability concerns.
Overall, the choice between the two will come down to personal preferences and needs. It’s important to try on both and see which one feels better for your feet and running style.
Which One Should You Buy? Brooks Glycerin 19 or Hoka Bondi 7?
After a thorough analysis of the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7, it’s evident that both running shoes have their unique features and benefits. However, the decision regarding which one to buy ultimately depends on your personal preferences, body shape, and running style.
Brooks Glycerin 19
The Brooks Glycerin 19 provides a comfortable and stable ride, thanks to its plush cushioning and secure fit. It’s suitable for long runs and people with high arches and neutral pronation. The shoe’s DNA Loft foam technology and OrthoLite sockliner help reduce the impact on your feet and provide a soft landing experience.
Moreover, the Glycerin 19 has an adaptable fit that hugs your feet for maximum support and comfort. Its upper mesh material promotes proper ventilation, keeping your feet cool and dry during your runs.
Hoka Bondi 7
The Hoka Bondi 7 is a highly cushioned shoe that provides maximum shock absorption, making it a good choice for runners with joint issues. Its wider forefoot design allows your toes to spread out, thus promoting better balance and stability.
Additionally, the Bondi 7 has a Meta-Rocker technology that helps propel your feet forward, reducing strain and fatigue on your muscles. Its full EVA midsole provides a smooth and balanced ride, while the upper mesh material enhances breathability.
Which One to Buy?
Ultimately, the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 offer unique features that cater to different types of runners. If you’re looking for a shoe that provides maximum comfort and flexibility without compromising on stability, then the Glycerin 19 is the perfect choice for you. However, if you want a highly cushioned shoe that can absorb maximum shock to protect your joints, then the Bondi 7 is the way to go.
It’s essential to consider your specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two shoes. Don’t hesitate to try both pairs on and see which one feels more comfortable and supportive to your feet. Ultimately, the decision is yours, and you should choose the one that helps you achieve your running goals while keeping your feet healthy and protected.
Based on my experience running and testing the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7, it’s clear that both shoes have their unique strengths and weaknesses. If you’re looking for a shoe that’s highly cushioned and provides a plush ride, the Hoka Bondi 7 is a great option. On the other hand, if you’re seeking a shoe that provides a balance of cushioning and responsiveness, the Brooks Glycerin 19 is a better choice.
Ultimately, the decision on which shoe to buy comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of each runner. The table below summarizes the key differences between the two shoes.
|Brooks Glycerin 19||Hoka Bondi 7|
|Weight (M)||10.2 oz||10.9 oz|
|Heel-to-toe drop||10 mm||4 mm|
|Cushioning||BioMoGo DNA, DNA Loft||EVA, Early Stage Meta-Rocker|
|Fit||Medium to wide||Medium to wide|
Overall, both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Hoka Bondi 7 are great shoes that offer unique features for runners. As an expert in the field, I highly recommend trying both shoes and determining which one fits your needs and preferences better. Regardless of which shoe you choose, make sure it fits properly and provides the necessary support and cushioning for your running style.
- Hoka Clifton Vs Bondi: Which Shoe Is Best For You?
- What The 5 Best Badminton Shoes – Top Picks & Reviews
- What’s The Difference Between Running And Training Shoes? 5 Things Easy To Know
- 5k Run Calories: Understanding the Benefits of a 5k Run - May 25, 2023
- How Long Would It Take To Walk 20 Miles - May 13, 2023
- How Many Steps Are in a 5K: A Simple Guide to Measuring Your Distance - May 1, 2023